Fire :(
Re: Fire :(
I don't cut acrylic ... but I guess improved extraction (and maybe air assist) would reduce the risk ?
Take the fumes out .. then they cant ignite
Take the fumes out .. then they cant ignite
Re: Fire :(
You should treat all materials the same
It's not just acrylic that gives off resigns/fumes that can ignite
It's not just acrylic that gives off resigns/fumes that can ignite
Re: Fire :(
not quite true .. some are MUCH worse than others !Tom wrote:You should treat all materials the same
It's not just acrylic that gives off resigns/fumes that can ignite
you'd have to try hard to ignite MDF fumes
I've spent the last hours of today with a blow torch and scraper cleaning off the MDF residue of the bed .. no fires or anything !
Re: Fire :(
Thats quite funny
Re: Fire :(
I thought so too, as I was doing it ! lol
once a year it gets a good going over
new honeycombe too ...
once a year it gets a good going over
new honeycombe too ...
Re: Fire :(
Once a year that's terrible
Re: Fire :(
More air = more oxygen. Tried itLightnin wrote:I don't cut acrylic ... but I guess improved extraction (and maybe air assist) would reduce the risk ?
Take the fumes out .. then they cant ignite
The acrylic is basically getting too hot and becoming more volatile at the hot spot, I doubt we would be able to increase the extraction enough to the system (I have quite a good setup already) - inert gas would be a possibility.
All materials we use in the lasers carry a risk - airborne particles become explosive even. MDF, once alight burns quite fiercely - given the right circumstances I suspect it could be as good (bad!?) as acrylic. Wood fumes are flammable - do the school experiment of heating sawdust in a test tube and ignite the fumes - think someone made an engine to work off the fumes too!
The sticky residue MDF excretes when cut in the laser (I assume the bonding agent) help to suppress a flame so the risk is lower but still present.
At the end of the day the 'never leave unattended' is the final solution
Cheers
Dave
Using two LS3060's and an ex 3020 user
Please note I am not employed by HPC, any advice or recomendations I give are based on my own experience and are not necessarily the same as HPC's. First point of contact on any hardware issues should be with HPC
Please note I am not employed by HPC, any advice or recomendations I give are based on my own experience and are not necessarily the same as HPC's. First point of contact on any hardware issues should be with HPC
-
llamalasers
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 10:17 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fire :(
Aye from now on I'm physically checking the machine every minute or so when doing a cut.. it's only a matter of standing up and looking over.
60W LS6840 & CW4000
started out with LS3040
started out with LS3040
Re: Fire :(
I have wondered about rigging up some sort of adjustable heat detector that sits in the machine - phillydee - one for you matey 
Using two LS3060's and an ex 3020 user
Please note I am not employed by HPC, any advice or recomendations I give are based on my own experience and are not necessarily the same as HPC's. First point of contact on any hardware issues should be with HPC
Please note I am not employed by HPC, any advice or recomendations I give are based on my own experience and are not necessarily the same as HPC's. First point of contact on any hardware issues should be with HPC
-
TimBobTastic
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 6:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fire :(
is fire a higher risk on machined with honeycomb beds that sit in a pretty much enclosed tray?
If so... could the enclosed tray be modified so it was more open allowing for a better flow of flammable gasses...
Just thinking aloud really... probably a bad idea for reasons I have not thought of... But I have access to a friendly bunch of sheet metal workers and industry standard 3D CAD... so was wondering if a little design effort could reduce the risk of fire without making big changes to the machine (apart from swapping the honeycomb tray)
If so... could the enclosed tray be modified so it was more open allowing for a better flow of flammable gasses...
Just thinking aloud really... probably a bad idea for reasons I have not thought of... But I have access to a friendly bunch of sheet metal workers and industry standard 3D CAD... so was wondering if a little design effort could reduce the risk of fire without making big changes to the machine (apart from swapping the honeycomb tray)
LS3060 PLUS with a 60w tube, Chiller and Bofa filter 
Online Store http://www.t2kreations.co.uk
Personal Website... http://www.timbobtastic.com
Online Store http://www.t2kreations.co.uk
Personal Website... http://www.timbobtastic.com
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests